From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Monique

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1995
211 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 26, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Ruth Zuckerman, J.).


Testimony that respondent failed to contact the child or the agency for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition, though able to do so, gave rise to a presumption of abandonment that respondent failed to rebut (Matter of Anthony M., 195 A.D.2d 315, 315-316). Respondent was not prevented from visiting or communicating with the child during this time period. The court properly rejected respondent's argument that a third party acted as her "agent" in communicating with the agency where it was established that respondent was at liberty at that time and could have called herself. Lastly, the court properly found that the termination of parental rights to allow for adoption by the foster mother was in the best interests of the child.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Monique

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1995
211 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Monique

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KAREEMA MONIQUE B., a Child Alleged to be Abandoned…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 608

Citing Cases

Matter of Carton

Accordingly, we find that on balance, the appellant's due process rights were not violated and thus the…

In re Guardianship

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Ellerin, Rubin, JJ. Testimony that respondent failed to visit…