From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mondaca v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1993
195 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 12, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

General Municipal Law § 50-e requires that a person who sues a municipality or its subdivision in tort must serve a notice of claim upon the proposed defendant within 90 days of the incident constituting the gravaman of the complaint so that it may have a timely opportunity to investigate the matter before changes occur and before memories of possible witnesses fade (see, Caselli v City of New York, 105 A.D.2d 251). A person who does not serve a timely notice of claim may move, as in the instant case, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim. However, where there is an unexplained delay in service of a notice of claim, and prejudice to the municipality or its subdivision, the application should be denied (see, Goudie v County of Putnam, 95 A.D.2d 823). The court must "strike an equitable balance between a public corporation's need for prompt notification of a claim against it, and an injured party's interest in just compensation" (Matter of Ferrer v. City of New York, 172 A.D.2d 240, 241). Applying these principles, we conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the application. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, O'Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Mondaca v. County of Westchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1993
195 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Mondaca v. County of Westchester

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LIZETTE MONDACA et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 260

Citing Cases

Matarrese v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

This is not a case where a petitioner has attempted to provide an excuse, no matter how feeble, for the…

Traina v. Zambrana

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It is well settled that the question of…