From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Moczydlowski v. Westall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 30, 1949
275 App. Div. 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

August 30, 1949.


Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the petition granted. The alteration made in the designating petition was not substantial in character. Concededly no fraud was involved and the voters who signed the petition obviously intended to designate petitioner as a candidate for nomination for the office of councilman. On the conceded facts, the alteration in question was made before the petition passed out of the control of the notary public who took the acknowledgment. Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Nolan, P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [ 195 Misc. 839.]


Summaries of

Matter of Moczydlowski v. Westall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 30, 1949
275 App. Div. 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Matter of Moczydlowski v. Westall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALOYSIUS MOCZYDLOWSKI, Appellant, against WALTER W…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 30, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Matter of King v. Sunderland

In each petition, the language was stricken and initialed by the witness. However, the alteration was not…