From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mize v. State Division of Human Rights

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1973
31 N.Y.2d 1032 (N.Y. 1973)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1973

Decided February 15, 1973

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department.

Anthony Manguso, Corporation Counsel ( James J. McLoughlin of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Edward Heller and Steven Jay Lacher for respondents-appellants.

Lawrence Kunin and Henry Spitz for State Division of Human Rights, respondent.

Thomas P. McMahon for Buffalo Police Benevolent Association, respondent.


On the appeal by City of Buffalo: Order affirmed, without costs.

On the cross appeal by petitioners: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that petitioners were not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; see Zachary v. Macy Co., 31 N.Y.2d 443). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JASEN, JONES and WACHTLER. Taking no part: Judges BREITEL and GABRIELLI.


Summaries of

Mize v. State Division of Human Rights

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 15, 1973
31 N.Y.2d 1032 (N.Y. 1973)
Case details for

Mize v. State Division of Human Rights

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FLORENCE MIZE et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. STATE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 15, 1973

Citations

31 N.Y.2d 1032 (N.Y. 1973)
342 N.Y.S.2d 65
294 N.E.2d 851

Citing Cases

Town of W. Hartford v. Committee on Human Rights

The court also agreed with the hearing tribunal's theory that pay differentials between men and women can be…

State Div. of H.R. v. City of Niagara Falls

The commissioner found and the appeal board affirmed that petitioners had engaged in a discriminatory…