From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Minchie v. Corning Glass Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 1, 1955
285 App. Div. 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

April 1, 1955.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Foster, P.J., Coon, Halpern, Imrie and Zeller, JJ.


Claimant had been employed by this employer for approximately forty-four years. He concededly contracted silicosis during his employment in the "pot and clay" department prior to 1934. Thereafter he was given other employment in the same plant. There is medical evidence that he became totally and permanently disabled on October 1, 1950, as a result of silicosis contracted in his employment. Appellant urges that there is no substantial evidence that claimant was injuriously exposed within two years of his disablement, under section 44-a Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. There is sufficient evidence that claimant was exposed to dust during his entire employment. Moreover, claimant is entitled to the benefit of the provisions of section 40 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, because it is undisputed and the board has found that claimant contracted the disease in the same employment with the same employer by whom he was employed at the time of his disablement. Section 44-a, extending the period of limitation in silicosis cases from one year to two years, does not deprive claimant of the other provisions of section 40. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Minchie v. Corning Glass Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 1, 1955
285 App. Div. 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Matter of Minchie v. Corning Glass Works

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANDREW MINCHIE, Respondent, against CORNING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 1097 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Matter of Mlodozeniec v. Worthington Corp.

" (McKinney's Cons. Laws of N.Y., Book 1, Statutes, § 54 and cases cited.) In the eyes of its sponsors, at…

Matter of Gajewski v. Amer. Rad. Corp.

COON and HALPERN, JJ. (dissenting). We think the case of Matter of Minchie v. Corning Glass Works ( 285 App.…