From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Miller v. Ravitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 11, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

The petitioner was a probationary Assistant Station Supervisor and was subsequently demoted to his former position as Railroad Clerk because he was found to be unfit for the supervisory position by virtue of his heart condition. The testimony adduced at the hearing disclosed that the petitioner's medical condition precluded him from engaging in excessive stair climbing or other types of physical exertion attendant to his probationary position.

The Human Rights Law prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of disability (see, Executive Law § 296, [2]). However, a person whose condition prohibits him from performing employment duties in a reasonable manner is not considered disabled under the statute (see, Executive Law § 292 [c]). Although, here the petitioner was capable of performing certain select assignments within the job title, his heart condition prevented him from performing in a reasonable manner the principal assignment within the title, that of station inspector (see, Executive Law § 292 [c]; Matter of Miller v Ravitch, 60 N.Y.2d 527; Matter of Caminiti v. New York City Tr. Auth. Police Dept., 125 A.D.2d 306). Because the petitioner was not disabled within the meaning of the Human Rights Law, he was not protected by its provisions, and his demotion, accordingly, did not violate the antidiscrimination proscriptions contained therein. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Miller v. Ravitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Miller v. Ravitch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KENNETH MILLER, Respondent, v. RICHARD RAVITCH et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 579 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Yasinosky v. New York City Transit Authority

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The court properly concluded that the…

Parker v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.

See Disanto, 1998 WL 474136, at *6 n. 4; see also Reeves, 140 F.3d at 154.See ATT Bell Labs. v. N.Y. State…