From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Miller v. Pierson Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

September, 1929.


Motion to substitute administratrix granted. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs to the claimant against the employer and its insurance carrier, upon the ground that the award of eight hundred and eighty dollars and seventy cents had vested. ( State ex rel. Munding v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, 92 Ohio St. 434; 111 N.E. 299; United Collieries, Ltd., v. Hendry, 2 B.W.C.C. 308; Price v. Westminster Brymbo Coal Co., 8 id. 257.) Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Van Kirk, P.J., and Hinman, J., dissent on ground that "compensation and benefits shall be paid only to employees or their dependents." (Workmen's Comp. Law, § 33) This award was benefits and remains such until paid. Upon the death of the widow of the deceased employee her claim abated and the award to her did not pass to her estate. No dependent survived to whom benefits could be paid.


Summaries of

Matter of Miller v. Pierson Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Matter of Miller v. Pierson Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LIBBIE MILLER, Respondent, against PIERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1929

Citations

227 App. Div. 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Matter of Stickle v. Westcott Garage

(Workmen's Compensation Law, § 123 [Cons. Laws, ch. 67]; Matter of Whitmyre v. International Business Machine…

Matter of Stickle v. Westcott Garage

The settlement agreement of $4,000 between claimant and carrier, having been properly entered upon by the…