From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF MILLER v. LISK MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

May, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.


Motion to dismiss appeal is denied, not because the claimant is at fault, but because the Industrial Board has neglected, for about six weeks after the appeal was taken, to deliver to the Attorney-General the record upon which to make the findings. This denial may be a hardship to the claimant, but the carrier has the right to be heard.


Summaries of

MATTER OF MILLER v. LISK MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

MATTER OF MILLER v. LISK MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RAYMOND MILLER, Respondent, against LISK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 870 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)