Opinion
October 2, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Sullivan, J.).
Order and judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
As the trier of fact, the trial court was entitled to utilize its own methods in computing the value of the subject property within the framework of the evidence adduced at the trial (see, Matter of City of New York [Fourth Ave.], 255 N.Y. 25, 30, rearg denied 255 N.Y. 602). We find no basis in the record for disturbing the trial court's decision, usage and application of Matter of Mount Hous. Co. v Rubino ( 90 A.D.2d 780). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.