From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Michalek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
180 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 24, 1992.

Vincent Scarsella for petitioner.

James J. Michalek, respondent pro se.


James J. Michalek was disbarred by order of this court on August 26, 1991, based on certain felony convictions in Erie County Court (Matter of Michalek, 176 A.D.2d 1246).

The Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District (Committee) moved to punish respondent for civil and criminal contempt for violating the order of disbarment and for unlawfully practicing law. Respondent appeared on the return date and filed a written answer denying those charges. A reference was ordered, but respondent, although given notice, failed to appear at the hearing before the Referee. With notice to respondent, the Committee moved to confirm the Referee's report. Respondent again failed to appear.

The record supports the Referee's findings that, after respondent was personally served with the order of disbarment, he continued to maintain a law office at 180 Main Street, Hamburg, New York; signs inside and outside that office continued to indicate that respondent was an attorney at law; clients continued to make payments on legal fees to respondent's secretary at that office; and respondent filed a letter with the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Western District of New York stating that a named individual was a client and making representations to the court on behalf of that person.

Respondent's conduct constitutes criminal contempt of this court (see, Judiciary Law § 750 [A] [3]) and he should be punished by a fine of $1,000 and 30 days' imprisonment.

BOOMER, J.P., PINE, BALIO, LAWTON and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Order of contempt entered.


Summaries of

Matter of Michalek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 24, 1992
180 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Matter of Michalek

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES J. MICHALEK, Respondent. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 67 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 892

Citing Cases

Matter of Lader v. Finnerty

The petitioner's contention is meritless. There can be no dispute that the Grievance Committee may institute…

Matter of Carrigan

By delegating to his paralegal his responsibility to finalize an estate and by failing to supervise the…