Opinion
July 22, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Wood, J.).
On the court's own motion, appellants' notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, said application is referred to Justice Rubin and leave to appeal is granted by Justice Rubin (CPLR 5701 [b] [1]).
Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Planning Board of the Town of Patterson was without authority to deny petitioner's application for site plan approval on the ground that, under its interpretation of the local zoning ordinance, the proposed use was not permitted. "The power to interpret the provisions of the local zoning law is vested exclusively in the zoning board of appeals" ( Rattner v. Planning Commn., 103 A.D.2d 826; see, Town Law, §§ 267, 274-a; 113 Hillside Ave. Corp. v. Village of Westbury, 27 A.D.2d 858; Matter of Kalen, 248 App. Div. 777). The local planning board shall not be permitted to disapprove a use under the guise of denying site plan approval ( Matter of Gershowitz v. Planning Bd., 69 A.D.2d 460, revd on other grounds 52 N.Y.2d 763). Thus, Special Term properly denied appellants' motion to dismiss the petition. Brown, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.