From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Meyer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1905
74 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1905)

Opinion

Argued April 17, 1905

Decided May 2, 1905

William N. Cohen, Mayer L. Halff and Rastus S. Ransom for Sophie Stark, appellant.

Albert Stickney and Albert Stickney, Jr., for Aubrey E. Meyer, appellant.

Herbert Parsons for Estate of Linda Meyer, an Incompetent, appellant and respondent.

Ferdinand R. Minrath for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: GRAY, O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN and WERNER, JJ., and BARTLETT, J., on the ground that the executors and trustees were justified in executing the McGill agreement and continuing that business; but is unable to concur that the charges of interest against the four beneficiaries under the will, as made by the referee and adopted by the surrogate, were proper. Dissenting: CULLEN, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Matter of Meyer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1905
74 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1905)
Case details for

Matter of Meyer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Accounting of IDA MEYER et al., as Executors of and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 2, 1905

Citations

74 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1905)
74 N.E. 1120

Citing Cases

Matter of Andrus

When an executor petitions for judicial settlement of his account, the Surrogate has the power, to pass upon…