From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Metzger v. Metzger Press

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 30, 1950
96 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 1950)

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1950

Decided November 30, 1950

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Frederick Behr and Frederick Behr, Jr., for appellants.

Abraham Markhoff for Belle Metzger, respondent.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Daniel Polansky, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with one bill of costs to the claimant and the Workmen's Compensation Board. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Metzger v. Metzger Press

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 30, 1950
96 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 1950)
Case details for

Matter of Metzger v. Metzger Press

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BELLE METZGER, Respondent, against METZGER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 30, 1950

Citations

96 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 1950)
96 N.E.2d 90

Citing Cases

Matter of Wood v. Queen City Neon Sign Co.

Knowledge of the nature of the disease and its relationship to employment was not acquired until a year…

Matter of Mlodozeniec v. Worthington Corp.

) The case is akin to many in which amendments of the Workmen's Compensation Law have been held…