From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Meighan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1905
75 N.E. 1133 (N.Y. 1905)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1905

Decided October 17, 1905

John A. Garver for appellants.

George Welwood Murray and Charles P. Howland for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, VANN and WERNER, JJ. Absent: O'BRIEN, J.


This record discloses a state of facts entitling the petitioners to a lien on the fund restored by the directors to the treasury of the company.

In my opinion the vital error of the decision below is the failure to recognize the fact that the plaintiff Watkins sued on behalf of himself and all other stockholders similarly situated, making the company a party defendant after requesting it to bring the action and its failure to do so within a reasonable time. The company is the real party plaintiff.

I concur in the dissenting opinion of the Appellate Division.


Summaries of

Matter of Meighan

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1905
75 N.E. 1133 (N.Y. 1905)
Case details for

Matter of Meighan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Petition of BURTON C. MEIGHAN et al., Appellants, to…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1905

Citations

75 N.E. 1133 (N.Y. 1905)
75 N.E. 1133