From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Meigh v. Sperry Gyroscope Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 16, 1954
284 App. Div. 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

December 16, 1954.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Foster, P.J., Coon, Halpern, Imrie and Zeller, JJ.


Decedent was employed as a "journeyman's helper" and his work required him to carry "patterns" for precision instruments from place to place within the plant and to points outside the plant. On the morning before he died decedent had carried some patterns from the plant to an automobile for delivery elsewhere, drove the car to the points of delivery and carried the patterns inside. He had lunch outside, and thereafter returned to the plant. About two o'clock, P.M., as he was walking toward a coemployee and started to say something, he collapsed, fell backward to the floor, and died shortly thereafter. He had a pre-existing heart condition, and there was testimony that the cause of his death was a heart attack, and that in falling he fractured his skull. There is no evidence that deceased slipped or stumbled, or that he struck any object in falling. Claimant contends that the exertion of his work brought on the heart attack and death. The nature and amount of exertion presents a question of fact. The medical testimony as to the cause of his attack is conflicting, presenting only a question of fact. The board has found that decedent died of natural causes. While appellant cites a number of somewhat similar cases where a contrary finding by the board has been sustained, they are not authority for reversing the finding of the board here. Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Meigh v. Sperry Gyroscope Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 16, 1954
284 App. Div. 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Matter of Meigh v. Sperry Gyroscope Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BARBARA F. MEIGH, Appellant, against SPERRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1954

Citations

284 App. Div. 1074 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Citing Cases

Matter of Szatkowski v. Bethlehem Steel Company

We cannot say that the board's finding was not supported by substantial evidence. Upon the evidence, it was…

Matter of Schwarz v. Benedict Benedict

As to this contention we need only to point out that we are powerless to compel the board to be consistent in…