From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Medina Power Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 3, 1997

Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton and Fallon, JJ.


Order and judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, stay vacated and parties directed to proceed to arbitration. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting petitioner's application for an order pursuant to CPLR 7503 (b) permanently staying arbitration on the ground that a prior arbitration award is res judicata of the issues raised in the instant proceeding. The doctrine of res judicata applies only to issues resolved in the prior arbitration (see, Rembrandt Indus. v. Hodges Intl., 38 N.Y.2d 502, 504); the parties are barred "from relitigating only those matters which were actually contested and therefore determined by the award" (Matter of Cine-Source, Inc. v. Burrows, 180 A.D.2d 592, 594). In the instant proceeding, there are disputed factual issues whether respondent's entitlement to a termination charge under Article VI of the parties' agreement was resolved in the prior arbitration (see, Burbank Broadcasting Co. v. Roslin Radio Sales, 99 A.D.2d 976, 977). Those issues are within the exclusive province of the arbitrator to resolve (see, Matter of City School Dist. v Tonawanda Educ. Assn., 63 N.Y.2d 846, 848; Matter of Port Auth. v Port Auth. Police Sergeants Benevolent Assn., 225 A.D.2d 503; Lopez v. Parke Rose Mgt. Sys., 138 A.D.2d 576, 577). We therefore vacate the permanent stay of arbitration and direct the parties to proceed to arbitration. (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J. — Arbitration.)


Summaries of

Matter of Medina Power Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 1997
241 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Medina Power Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between MEDINA POWER COMPANY, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 3, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 399

Citing Cases

Falzone v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire

We agree with the majority that it generally is within the arbitrator's discretion to determine the…

In re Town of Newburgh v. Civil Service Emp.

We disagree with the petitioner's argument that arbitration of the second grievance necessarily presents a…