From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mecca v. Staten Island

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner Joseph Mecca, M.D., was an employee and shareholder of the appellant Staten Island Radiological Associates, P.C. (hereinafter SIRA), until the termination of his employment on or about July 1, 1985. Upon his association with SIRA in 1982, Mecca became a party to both an employment and a shareholders' agreement. Those agreements specified arbitration as the method for resolution of any disputes between the parties. Following his discharge, Mecca sought arbitration of disputes concerning his severance pay and the redemption of his shares in SIRA.

At issue here is the construction of the arbitration clause of the shareholders' agreement. The parties disagree as to whether the language, "each such party shall appoint one * * * arbitrator", means each party to the dispute or each party as a signatory to the agreement. Mecca and SIRA appointed one arbitrator each and the four remaining shareholders in SIRA also attempted to designate one arbitrator each. This construction of the arbitration clause would permit SIRA and its shareholders to align a greater number of appointees against Mecca's single appointee. The court found that this construction would be unreasonable and contrary to the parties' intentions at the time the agreement was entered into. We agree. The proper construction of the words "each party" is each party to the dispute, not each signatory to the arbitration agreement. Any other construction would render the arbitration a "sham and its determination a foregone conclusion" (Matter of Di Stasio [Avallone], 27 A.D.2d 726, 727 [Steuer, J., dissenting], mod 21 N.Y.2d 665).

Finally, the court's reservation of the power to appoint a neutral arbitrator should the two presently designated arbitrators be unable to agree or act upon such an appointment, is authorized not only by CPLR 7504, but also by the arbitration agreement. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Mecca v. Staten Island

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Mecca v. Staten Island

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH MECCA, Respondent, v. STATEN ISLAND RADIOLOGICAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 212

Citing Cases

In re Town of Wallkill Ind. Dev. v. Assessor

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. On a prior appeal, this court upheld…