From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mead

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1917
221 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1917

Decided October 16, 1917

Lee L. Ottaway for Florence B. Mead, appellant and respondent.

Robert H. Wilson for William E. Hallock et al., respondents and appellants.

H.C. Storck and George A. McLaughlin for respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Mead

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 16, 1917
221 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Matter of Mead

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Accounting of FLORENCE B. MEAD et al., as Executors…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 16, 1917

Citations

221 N.Y. 645 (N.Y. 1917)
117 N.E. 1076

Citing Cases

Matter of Ludlam

(7) The transaction may not be sustained as a valid gift since the giving of the check is executory and the…

Matter of Seyffert

Even if the claimant had actually accepted the check, a gift of the money would not have been consummated…