Opinion
January 29, 1996
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
To annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence to support the determination ( see, Matter of Decker v Scoralick, 209 A.D.2d 517). The petitioner's contention that the Sheriff's determination was not supported by substantial evidence is without merit. The testimony at the hearing established the facts necessary to sustain the charges against the petitioner. The Hearing Officer decided to credit the respondents' witnesses and not the testimony of the petitioner and his witnesses. A reviewing court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the Hearing Officer where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists ( see, Matter of Decker v Scoralick, supra; Matter of Gatto v Adduci, 182 A.D.2d 760). The Hearing Officer's findings were based on evidence of record and were in a form to permit intelligent review ( see, Matter of Simpson v Wolansky, 38 N.Y.2d 391; Matter of Decker v Scoralick, supra). The petitioner's contention that the penalty of termination was excessive is without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.