From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McMahon v. Gretzula

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

March, 1933.


Certified questions of law under section 23 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law, pursuant to a resolution of the State Industrial Board, dated May 6, 1932. (See 227 App. Div. 256.)


The Industrial Board submits to this court the following questions: "1. Has the New York State Industrial Board the power and jurisdiction to consider the application made by claimants to reopen this claim as against the insurance carrier, in view of the fact that an award against said carrier has been reversed and the claim against said carrier dismissed on a previous appeal to this court? 2. If so, has the New York State Industrial Board the power and jurisdiction to reopen this claim and to grant a reformation of the policy of insurance herein, if the record and evidence which may be submitted so warrant?" The first question submitted is answered in the affirmative under the authority of Matter of Di Donato v. Rosenberg ( 256 N.Y. 412). The second question submitted is answered in the affirmative under the authority of Royal Indemnity Co. v. Heller ( 256 N.Y. 322) and Barone v. AEtna Life Ins. Co. (260 id. 410). All concur. Both questions certified by the State Industrial Board, under section 23 of the Workmen's Compensation Law, answered in the affirmative.


Summaries of

Matter of McMahon v. Gretzula

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of McMahon v. Gretzula

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claims of MARGARET McMAHON and Others, Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Citing Cases

Matter of Whitmyre v. Int'l Bus. Machines Corp.

But the Industrial Board may not disregard a final adjudication of the Court of Appeals, and then go forward…

Matter of McSweeney v. Hammerlund Mfg. Co.

This language has received judicial construction in full consonance with the spirit in which it was written.…