From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McLaughlin v. North Bellmore Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 1980
73 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

January 14, 1980


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, made February 14, 1978, after a hearing, which found the petitioner guilty of incompetence and dismissed her from her position as a clerk-typist. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the respondent for a new hearing, to be held before a different hearing officer, and a new determination. We believe that, as a matter of propriety and because of his personal involvement, the hearing officer, Dominic Savino, should have disqualified himself from acting with respect to the charges against petitioner (see Matter of Aiello v. Tempera, 65 A.D.2d 791; Matter of Waters v. McGinnis, 29 A.D.2d 969; Matter of Brzezinski v. Wiater, 46 A.D.2d 995). We note that Savino's involvement with the petitioner's relationship with her superiors was both long standing and intimate. Thus, in January of 1977, petitioner brought a complaint before Savino concerning her alleged difficulties with the principal of the school where she worked. Savino was the only officer of the respondent whom petitioner had consulted relative to this matter. Moreover, on June 16, 1977, just eight days prior to the announcement of formal charges against her, petitioner, Savino and two of petitioner's supervisors met together. At this meeting, petitioner was confronted with allegations as to the poor quality of her work. It was suggested that she retire or resign, or that formal charges would be preferred against her. Under the circumstances, Savino should have disqualified himself from acting as hearing officer. His failure to do so deprived petitioner of a fair and impartial hearing. Accordingly, a new hearing must be held before a different hearing officer. In view of the foregoing, we find it unnecessary to pass upon petitioner's other contentions. Mollen, P.J., Damiani, Mangano and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of McLaughlin v. North Bellmore Union

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 14, 1980
73 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Matter of McLaughlin v. North Bellmore Union

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DIANA McLAUGHLIN, Petitioner, v. NORTH BELLMORE UNION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1980

Citations

73 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Pelaez v. Waterfront Comm

ted the investigation or had caused the charges to be preferred (see Matter of Murchison, 349 U.S. 133;…

Matter of Reed v. Town of Huntington

A penalty is excessive only if it is so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances,…