From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McKinnon v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Summary

In McKinnon v. Hall, 10 Colo. App. 291, 50 P. 1052, there appears in the syllabus the following: "The appellate court will, sua sponte, notice want of jurisdiction in the trial court, if apparent on the record, though the question is not raised in either court by the parties."

Summary of this case from O'Donnell v. City of Butte

Opinion

November, 1917.


Motion to dismiss appeal denied; the court finding that the time in which to appeal was not limited under section 1351 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Either party upon the argument may use any exhibit not printed in the record.


Summaries of

Matter of McKinnon v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1917
181 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

In McKinnon v. Hall, 10 Colo. App. 291, 50 P. 1052, there appears in the syllabus the following: "The appellate court will, sua sponte, notice want of jurisdiction in the trial court, if apparent on the record, though the question is not raised in either court by the parties."

Summary of this case from O'Donnell v. City of Butte
Case details for

Matter of McKinnon v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of FRANK H…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1917

Citations

181 App. Div. 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Citing Cases

Rundle v. Republic Cement Corporation

Defendants called no witnesses. By agreement of counsel the jury was discharged and the matter submitted to…

Woodward v. Molander

In the circumstances of the record, only the court where Kinsella's estate was in course of administration…