Opinion
Decided October 28, 1999
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.).
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent's determination finding that petitioner was not eligible for merit time allowance (see, Correction Law § 803) due to his "refusal to participate in programs/treatment recommended by department staff". Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the ground that petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies in that he did not file a grievance with respect to the denial of merit time. Petitioner appeals.
Respondent concedes, and we agree, that inasmuch as the record indicates that petitioner had inquired into the review process and was informed that there was no grievance procedure available, it was error to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Accordingly, the matter should be remitted to Supreme Court to address the merits.
MIKOLL, J.P., MERCURE, SPAIN, CARPINELLO and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the facts, without costs, petition reinstated and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court's decision.