From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McKenna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: March 4, 2003.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990. He maintains an office for the practice of law in New Jersey, where he was admitted in 1989.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards (Geoffrey E. Major of counsel), Albany, for petitioner.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


By order dated June 27, 2002, the Supreme Court of New Jersey publicly reprimanded respondent for failure to abide by a client's decision and for failure to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representation of the client. Respondent consented to the discipline.

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline upon respondent (see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has not replied to the motion.

Under the circumstances presented, we grant petitioner's motion and reciprocally censure respondent (see e.g. Matter of Mahoney, 166 A.D.2d 869).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is censured.


Summaries of

Matter of McKenna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of McKenna

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF KEITH A. McKENNA, an Attorney. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 774 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 320

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Bartman

Petitioner moves for an order imposing reciprocal discipline ( see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent does not…