From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McGuire v. Prendergast

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1916
112 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued April 11, 1916

Decided April 25, 1916

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( John F. O'Brien, Terence Farley, Elliot S. Benedict and Hamilton Rogers of counsel), for appellant.

Isidor Wels and Frank Moss for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, COLLIN, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Dissenting: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., and CUDDEBACK, J.


Summaries of

Matter of McGuire v. Prendergast

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 25, 1916
112 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of McGuire v. Prendergast

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of FRANK A. McGUIRE, Respondent, for a…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 25, 1916

Citations

112 N.E. 1064 (N.Y. 1916)
218 N.Y. 630