From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McGuire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1907
117 App. Div. 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

February 15, 1907.

James H. Hickey, for the appellant.

Theodore Connoly, for the respondents.


The material facts presented by this record differ from those preented in the Matter of Titus ( 117 App. Div. 621), argued and decided herewith, only in that the affiant, who asserts the facts positively, resided next door on the same avenue to the number from which the elector enrolled, and consequently the opinion in that matter is decisive of this appeal.

It follows that the order should be affirmed upon the authority of the opinion in Matter of Titus.

PATTERSON, P.J., concurred; CLARKE and INGRAHAM, JJ., dissented.


For the reasons stated in Matter of Titus, I concur in result.


For the reasons stated in the opinion handed down herewith in Matter of O'Brien ( 117 App. Div. 628), the order appealed from herein should be reversed and the application granted.

INGRAHAM, J., concurred.

Order affirmed. Order filed.


Summaries of

Matter of McGuire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 15, 1907
117 App. Div. 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Matter of McGuire

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application for an Order to Strike from the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1907

Citations

117 App. Div. 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
102 N.Y.S. 856

Citing Cases

Matter of Heineman

McLAUGHLIN, J.: This case cannot be distinguished from Matter of Titus ( 117 App. Div. 621; affd., 188 N.Y.…