From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McGrath v. Cornelius

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 27, 1968
30 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

June 27, 1968


MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. Respondent having failed either to file and serve an answer or to move with respect to the petition upon objections in point of law, the proceeding is remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the provisions of CPLR 7804 (subd. [e]) and, if Special Term be so advised, for further remittal to respondent Superintendent for reconsideration of his determination in accordance with the rule of Matter of Wallace v. Murphy ( 21 N.Y.2d 433). Were the proceeding properly before us on the present record, we would confirm the determination. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.


Summaries of

Matter of McGrath v. Cornelius

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 27, 1968
30 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Matter of McGrath v. Cornelius

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHN J. McGRATH, Appellant, v. ARTHUR CORNELIUS, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Matter Szklowin v. Planning Bd.

This does not mean that the courts should condone any notice violation no matter how serious the defect (see…

Matter of Colburn v. Examining Board

We do not find such a requirement to be unreasonable but in so holding it is observed that because the issue…