From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McGarrell v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1994
205 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 13, 1994


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence to support that determination (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135, 140; Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 231; Matter of County of Suffolk v Newman, 173 A.D.2d 618). The petitioner's contention that the Commissioner's determination was not supported by substantial evidence is without merit. The testimony of the two eyewitnesses established the facts necessary to sustain the charge of "misconduct and/or incompetence" against the petitioner. The Hearing Officer, before whom all of the witnesses appeared, decided to credit the testimony of those witnesses and not the testimony of the petitioner and her witness. A reviewing court may not weigh the evidence or reject the choice made by the Hearing Officer where there is conflicting evidence and room for choice exists (see, Matter of Lawrence v. Weinstein, 181 A.D.2d 888; Matter of Jeremias v. Sander, 177 A.D.2d 488). Further, the penalty imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233; Matter of Lawrence v. Weinstein, supra).

Finally, an applicant is constitutionally entitled to unprejudiced decision-making by an administrative agency (see, Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 46-47). It follows that a determination based not on a dispassionate review of the facts but on a body's prejudgment or biased evaluation must be set aside (see, Matter of Rotwein [Goodman], 291 N.Y. 116, 123). A mere allegation, however, will not suffice. There must be a factual demonstration to support the allegation and proof that the outcome flowed from it (see, Matter of Warder v. Board of Regents, 53 N.Y.2d 186, 197). Here, the record only reflects a conclusory allegation without proof to support it. Sullivan, J.P., Balletta, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of McGarrell v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1994
205 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of McGarrell v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SANDRIE McGARRELL, Petitioner, v. MACK L. CARTER, JR., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 424

Citing Cases

Matter of Legros v. New York Hlt. Hospitals

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs. In…

Matter of Henry v. Carter

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs. In…