Opinion
Argued June 5, 1917
Decided July 11, 1917
Theodore M. Crisp for appellant.
Hugo Hirsh for respondent.
Orders affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ.
Argued June 5, 1917
Decided July 11, 1917
Theodore M. Crisp for appellant.
Hugo Hirsh for respondent.
Orders affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ.
Full title:In the Matter of the Abrogation of Adoption Proceedings of ELMER F…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jul 11, 1917
Petitioner in the case at bar relies on statute, but there are indications that a court may have discretion…
People ex rel. Marabottini v. FarrNumerous are the cases which hold that the "statute governing adoption must be strictly complied with since…