From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McCoy v. Leonard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 16, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Winick in his memorandum decision dated January 27, 1987.

We are cognizant of the fact that the petitioner has just recently attained the age of 29 years and would, accordingly, no longer be eligible for consideration for employment as a Nassau County police officer pursuant to the maximum age requirements established by the county (see, Civil Service Law § 54; Nassau County civil service examination announcement issued Aug. 3, 1983). We are, however, unpersuaded by the appellants' assertion that the petitioner's eligibility terminated, since, had the petitioner not been arbitrarily disqualified from consideration by the appellants, thereby necessitating the institution of this proceeding, this situation would not have arisen. In short, the enforcement of the age requirement would be entirely unreasonable under the circumstances (cf., Matter of Faraguna v Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 140 A.D.2d 341). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of McCoy v. Leonard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 1988
140 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of McCoy v. Leonard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES McCOY, Respondent, v. ADELE LEONARD, as Executive…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 525 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Matter of Keryc v. Nassau Cty. Civil Service

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. While we find unpersuasive the respondents' contention…