From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McCarthy v. Brainard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1958
6 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

October 7, 1958


The question here is limited to whether the Commissioner of Welfare is entitled to reimbursement for the cost of maintaining the dependents of this incompetent after the appointment of the committee and until the time of the application. We hold that if the estate of the incompetent is sufficiently large there is no reason why his obligation to support his dependents should not be enforced. The Federal statute (U.S. Code, tit. 38, § 3001, subd. [a]) does not prohibit recovery in such a case. However, we feel that the estate of this incompetent is hardly enough to provide for the incompetent's needs in the event of contingencies affecting his welfare. In the circumstances the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., M.M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of McCarthy v. Brainard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1958
6 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Matter of McCarthy v. Brainard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HENRY L. McCARTHY, as Commissioner of Welfare of the City…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Matter of Dugan

They must be enforced according to their spirit. The Veterans' Administration also relies on a long line of…