From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mazzella v. Stolzenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1993
199 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 20, 1993


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

There is substantial evidence to support the respondent's determination that the petitioner was guilty of the misconduct charged (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222; Matter of County of Suffolk v Newman, 173 A.D.2d 618).

With respect to the penalty imposed, the Acting Commissioner's 15-day suspension of the petitioner's employment, without pay, is not so disproportionate to the offense so as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see, Matter of Waters v City of Glen Cove, 181 A.D.2d 783; Matter of Capozzi v New York City Tr. Auth., 176 A.D.2d 237). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Mazzella v. Stolzenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 20, 1993
199 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Mazzella v. Stolzenberg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAWRENCE MAZZELLA, Petitioner, v. EDWARD STOLZENBERG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
608 N.Y.S.2d 89