From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mayeri v. Mayeri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 2001
279 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted December 15, 2000

January 11, 2001.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated September 28, 1999, which denied his objection to an order of the same court (Spegele, H.E.), dated May 6, 1999, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed the entry of a judgment against him for child support arrears in the sum of $5,070.98.

Harold Mayeri, Syosset, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Israella F. Mayeri, Bayside, N.Y., respondent pro se.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., FRED T. SANTUCCI, ANITA R. FLORIO ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Family Court Act § 439(e) provides that an aggrieved party may submit to a Family Court Judge specific written objections to the final order of the Hearing Examiner within 35 days after the mailing of the order to such party. Since the father did not timely submit written objections to the Hearing Examiner`s final order of support, the Family Court properly refused to consider the objections on this ground.

Moreover, the Family Court also properly refused to consider the father's objections on the ground that he failed to file proof of service of a copy of the objections on the mother (see, Matter of Rinaldi v. Rinaldi, 239 A.D.2d 506; Matter of Fokine v. Prisciantelli, 208 A.D.2d 534).


Summaries of

Matter of Mayeri v. Mayeri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 2001
279 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Mayeri v. Mayeri

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF HAROLD MAYERI, APPELLANT, v. ISRAELLA MAYERI, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
719 N.Y.S.2d 582

Citing Cases

Xiao-Lan Ma v. Washington

ORDERED that the order dated December 21, 2012, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or…

Bodouva v. Bodouva

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Objections to an order of a Support…