From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mayer v. Harmony Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 21, 1972
39 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

June 21, 1972


Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed July 19, 1971, denying appellants reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 8). Claimant, a baker's helper, sustained a myocardial infarction for which compensation was established. Based upon previous impairment of arthritis, asthma and diabetes, the carrier filed a claim for reimbursement under subdivision 8 of section 15 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. The majority of the board, finding that "the employer did not have sufficient knowledge of the claimant's preexisting condition to be able to make an informed judgment of permanent physical impairment", discharged the Special Fund from liability. To establish a claim for reimbursement under the statute the impairment must be, in fact, permanent and the employer must hire or continue in employment a worker "with knowledge of the impairment and a good faith belief of its permanency" ( Matter of Bellucci v. Tip Top Farms, 24 N.Y.2d 416, 420; Matter of Starrmann v. Abraham Strauss, 36 A.D.2d 670, mot. for lv. to app. den. 28 N.Y.2d 487). The finding of the majority of the board was more stringent than the Bellucci requirement (see Matter of Starrmann v. Abraham Strauss, supra; Matter of Lawrence v. New York State Realty Term. Co., 35 A.D.2d 235) and therefore must be reversed and remanded for proper findings (see Matter of Green v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, 38 A.D.2d 644; Matter of Ferry v. Jamestown Malleable Iron Div., 35 A.D.2d 870; Matter of Lawrence v. New York State Realty Term. Co., supra). Decision reversed, and matter remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith, with costs to appellants against the Special Disability Fund. Herlihy, P.J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Sweeney and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Mayer v. Harmony Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 21, 1972
39 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Matter of Mayer v. Harmony Country Club

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HERBERT MAYER, Respondent, v. HARMONY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Matter of Pasullo v. Civetta Construction Co.

In Bellucci (p. 420), it was held that the Special Fund will be liable if the employer employed or continued…

Matter of Hendricks v. Toro Power House, Inc.

(Cf. Matter of Milner v Country Developers, supra.) The board's finding implies a necessity of an "informed…