From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Matthews v. Kern

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Jan 5, 1942
177 Misc. 959 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1942)

Opinion

January 5, 1942.

Samuel Resnicoff, for the petitioner.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel, for the respondents.


This motion for an order directing the reinstatement of the petitioner and for incidental relief is denied. The petitioner did not file an application for citizenship within six months after the Wicks Act (Laws of 1939, chap. 927) took effect and may, therefore, not obtain the benefits of that statute. The case of Matter of Mazzarella v. Kern ( 285 N.Y. 85) is distinguishable in that there an application for citizenship had been filed prior to the expiration of the six months' period above referred to. The alleged presentation by the petitioner of an improperly filled out application, which was rejected because of its deficiencies, does not constitute the filing of an application for citizenship within the meaning of the Wicks Act.


Summaries of

Matter of Matthews v. Kern

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Jan 5, 1942
177 Misc. 959 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1942)
Case details for

Matter of Matthews v. Kern

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of LESLIE MATTHEWS, Petitioner, for an…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Jan 5, 1942

Citations

177 Misc. 959 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1942)
32 N.Y.S.2d 621