Opinion
March 29, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Chemung County.
By letter dated October 20, 1989, the Attorney-General advised us that respondent would not be submitting a brief and requested that the proceeding be dismissed as moot since the determination under review had been administratively reversed and expungement directed. Since petitioner has received all the relief that he is entitled to, the matter is moot (see, Matter of Wong v Coughlin, 150 A.D.2d 832).
Petition dismissed, as moot, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.