From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Martin v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 15, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Harris, J.).


We agree with Supreme Court that petitioner had no right to select the facility where he is incarcerated and that the decision to transfer inmates is within respondent's broad discretionary powers. The record demonstrates a rational basis for the subject transfer due to the fact that petitioner's incarceration status had been reclassified from maximum to medium security. As for petitioner's claim of retaliatory transfer, Supreme Court aptly noted that his assertions are conclusory and lacking in supporting factual allegations. All other contentions presented by petitioner are either without merit or not properly presented for appellate review.

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey, Weiss and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Martin v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Martin v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KEVIN MARTIN, Appellant, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 15, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 416

Citing Cases

Matter of Stanislas v. Goord

Supreme Court granted respondents' motion and this appeal ensued. Because petitioner received all the relief…

D.S. v. Hogan

( Matter of Anonymous v Commissionerof Health, 21 AD3d 841, 843 [1st Dept 2005] [internal quotation marks…