From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marra v. Cty. Court, Cty of Genesee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 25, 1962
17 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

October 25, 1962

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.


Application unanimously denied and proceeding dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Prohibition is an extraordinary remedy and should be employed only in unusual circumstances. The writ requested could be granted only if the County Court were totally lacking in jurisdiction, or if the failure to prohibit would leave the applicant without a legal remedy. ( People ex rel. Livingston v. Wyatt, 186 N.Y. 383, 393, 394; People ex rel. Childs v. Extraordinary Trial Term, 228 N.Y. 463, 468; People ex rel. Woodbury v. Hendrick, 215 N.Y. 339, 350.) Neither such situation here exists. (Application to restrain the respondents from continuing to assume jurisdiction in a criminal action against the petitioner.)


Summaries of

Matter of Marra v. Cty. Court, Cty of Genesee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 25, 1962
17 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Matter of Marra v. Cty. Court, Cty of Genesee

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANITA M. MARRA, Petitioner, v. COUNTY COURT OF THE COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1962

Citations

17 A.D.2d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Matter of Madole v. Davidson

This in no way affected the validity of the indictment insofar as it charged conspiracy to commit other named…