From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marksamer v. Guggenheimer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1978
374 N.E.2d 128 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Submitted January 11, 1978

Decided February 7, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.

W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (L. Kevin Sheridan and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for appellant.

Albert Kostrinsky and David Goldstein for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the two-month suspension of petitioner's license imposed by respondent Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs is reinstated, with costs.

Upon the commissioner's determination that a false affidavit of service had been filed by the petitioner, it should not be said that the sanction imposed was "shockingly disproportionate to the offense". (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 236; Matter of Butterly Green, v Lomenzo, 36 N.Y.2d 250.)

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Matter of Marksamer v. Guggenheimer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1978
374 N.E.2d 128 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Matter of Marksamer v. Guggenheimer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JESSE MARKSAMER, Respondent, v. ELINOR GUGGENHEIMER, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1978

Citations

374 N.E.2d 128 (N.Y. 1978)
374 N.E.2d 128
403 N.Y.S.2d 217

Citing Cases

Lorenzo v. Codd

The punishment imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense to shock one's sense of fairness so as to…