From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marcus v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 27, 1933
187 N.E. 633 (N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1933

Decided October 27, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Denis M. Hurley for appellant.

Edward H. Levine and J.W. Friedman for respondents.


The order below is affirmed, without costs. The court, however, does not approve of the statement in the opinion of the Appellate Division that the executive committee is given no authority under the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17) to determine which of conflicting valid petitions should be recognized, if such statement is to be construed as holding that the action of the executive committee is to be given no weight in determining the question. ( Matter of Trosk v. Cohen, 262 N.Y. 430.)

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Matter of Marcus v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 27, 1933
187 N.E. 633 (N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

Matter of Marcus v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BERNARD MARCUS, Appellant, against S. HOWARD COHEN et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 27, 1933

Citations

187 N.E. 633 (N.Y. 1933)
187 N.E. 633

Citing Cases

In re Peel

In a somewhat similar case it was held that when no nomination had been made for a particular office, persons…

Matter of Straus

Benjamin M. Gottesfeld and Malvin B. Mariash for respondent. Order affirmed on the authority of Matter of…