From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marcatante v. Lundy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1957
145 N.E.2d 874 (N.Y. 1957)

Opinion

Argued October 24, 1957

Decided October 24, 1957

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, SAMUEL RABIN, J.

Charles Margett for appellants-respondents.

Bernard Tompkins and Allen Beldock for respondent-appellant.

Bernard Tompkins and Benjamin R. Kaplan for respondents.



Upon the appeal of Clara Marcatante and others: Order reversed on the dissenting memorandum below. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DYE, FROESSEL and BURKE, JJ.; DESMOND, FULD and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Upon the appeal of Corning G. McKennee: Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ. Taking no part: FROESSEL, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Marcatante v. Lundy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 24, 1957
145 N.E.2d 874 (N.Y. 1957)
Case details for

Matter of Marcatante v. Lundy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CLARA MARCATANTE et al., Appellants-Respondents, against…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 24, 1957

Citations

145 N.E.2d 874 (N.Y. 1957)
145 N.E.2d 874
167 N.Y.S.2d 930

Citing Cases

Matter of White v. McNab

isions 3 and 10 of section 138 of the Election Law require the invalidation of signatures on an independent…

Matter of White v. McNab

The deletion of 468 signatures at Special Term is not challenged on appeal. We conclude that another 45 must…