From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1967
232 N.E.2d 852 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1967

Decided November 2, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Kenneth K. Floyd and Philip J. Caputo for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Henriette Frieder, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board. (See, e.g., Matter of Graves v. Tide Water Oil Sales Co., 275 N.Y. 583, affg. 249 App. Div. 911; Matter of Lowery v. Riss Co., 10 A.D.2d 489, mot. for lv. to app. den. 8 N.Y.2d 707. )

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim in the following memorandum in which Judge SCILEPPI concurs.


Assuming, for argument, that attending a dinner given by fellow employees and not by the employer brought the decedent within the scope of his employment, which is an assumption not free from doubt, it seems plain to me that at the time of the accident the dinner was long since finished, and that the accident resulted from personal activity on decedent's part and did not arise out of or in the course of his employment. The dinner was completed by 11:00 P.M., but decedent remained at the tavern until nearly 4:00 A.M. when the fatal accident occurred. This personal activity on his part materially added to the risk and, in my judgment, constituted a deviation from the course of his employment if his attendance at the dinner could be regarded as having been work connected in the beginning. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the claim dismissed.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 2, 1967
232 N.E.2d 852 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Claim of Mansfield v. General Adjustment Bureau

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BARBARA A. MANSFIELD, Respondent, v. GENERAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 2, 1967

Citations

232 N.E.2d 852 (N.Y. 1967)
232 N.E.2d 852
285 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

Rainear v. Rainear

The Appellate Division did not deal at all with the legal effect of the termination of the departure and the…

Mtr. of Anadio v. Ideal Leather

Here, there had been a lull or delay in the work, as directed and while goods were being processed, and at…