From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mansfield Contr. Corp. v. Lindsay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 22, 1973
41 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

May 22, 1973


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 22, 1973, dismissing the petition in this article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus and vacating the preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In affirming, we have noted the opinion on a related matter of Judge Whitman Knapp in the U.S. Court for the Southern District of New York. (See N.Y.L.J., May 4, 1973, p. 5, col. 5.) It would seem that to relegate the petitioner-appellant to an action at law is injurious to the taxpayers in that the city does not receive the benefit of the lowest bid and may, in addition, be held in damages. However, we seem foreclosed by the decision in People ex rel. Lunney v. Campbell ( 72 N.Y. 496). (See, also, Lynch v. Mayor, 2 App. Div. 213; Beckwith v. City of New York, 121 App. Div. 462.)

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Lane, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Mansfield Contr. Corp. v. Lindsay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 22, 1973
41 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Matter of Mansfield Contr. Corp. v. Lindsay

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MANSFIELD CONTRACTING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. JOHN V…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 22, 1973

Citations

41 A.D.2d 925 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Northeast Miss. Com. v. Vanderheyden

To allow the board to readvertise under the present facts would, in the court's opinion, sanction arbitrary…