Opinion
Argued January 28, 1895
Decided February 26, 1895
Charles L. Pashley for appellants.
William H. Godden for respondents.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Manhattan Railway Company v. Kent
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1895
40 N.E. 163 (N.Y. 1895)
Summaries of
Matter of Manhattan Railway Company v. Kent
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1895
40 N.E. 163 (N.Y. 1895)
Case details for
Matter of Manhattan Railway Company v. Kent
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 26, 1895
Citations
40 N.E. 163 (N.Y. 1895)
145 N.Y. 595