From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mangonon v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Upon our review of the record we find substantial evidence to support respondent's determination that the incident of February 6, 1980 did not constitute an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. Contrary to petitioner's contention, her injury was a risk inherent in her regular duties as a rehabilitation assistant and, while the patient's seizure may have been sudden, it was not out of the ordinary or unexpected. Petitioner's remaining contention has been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Mangonon v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Mangonon v. Regan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LOURDES MANGONON, Petitioner, v. EDWARD V. REGAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 965

Citing Cases

Matter of Vladick v. McCall

The remaining incident occurred when petitioner was attempting to steady a falling patient. Inasmuch as…