From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 1978
62 A.D.2d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

April 20, 1978


Appeal from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed October 7, 1976. The board found: "based on the credible evidence, claimant was required to use his own automobile in order to perform his job; therefore his trip to work became part of his employment. It is, therefore, found that accident arising out of and in the course of employment is established." Issues of fact are for the board and its decision is supported by substantial evidence and it is not erroneous as a matter of law (see Matter of Lutgen v Conte Elec., 50 A.D.2d 624; Matter of Shafran v Board of Educ., 25 A.D.2d 336, mot for lv to app den 18 N.Y.2d 579). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Greenblott, J.P., Main, Larkin, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 20, 1978
62 A.D.2d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Claim of Mang v. Actus Automobile Distributors, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RUTH MANG, Respondent, v. ACTUS AUTOMOBILE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1978

Citations

62 A.D.2d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Alitalia v. Tornillo

See Smith, supra; Whale Communications v. Death of Osborn, 759 P.2d 848 (Colo. App. 1988); Pittsburgh Testing…