From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Maneri v. Department of State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1997
240 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 30, 1997

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.


The petitioner was found to be untrustworthy as a result of his participation in a scheme in which several pieces of real property in Suffolk County were sold without the owners' knowledge or consent. The petitioner was also found to have engaged in misconduct by notarizing deeds without the signatories having appeared before him.

We find that the determination was supported by substantial evidence ( see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 231). Where a broker is "guilty of fraud or fraudulent practices * * * or has demonstrated untrustworthiness or incompetency to act as a real estate broker or salesman", the Department of State may revoke or suspend the license of that broker or salesman (Real Property Law § 441-c [a]). Accordingly, the determination by the Secretary of State to revoke the petitioner's real estate broker's licenses was proper, as was the determination to revoke the petitioner's notary public commission ( see, Executive Law § 130). Moreover, the penalty was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see, Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., supra, at 233).

Additionally, the revocation of the petitioner's real estate broker's licenses and his notary public commission were proper notwithstanding his receipt of a certificate of relief from civil disabilities ( see, e.g., Matter of Pulaski Inn, 182 A.D.2d 1116, 1117; Matter of Alaimo v. Ambach, 91 A.D.2d 695, 696; Correction Law § 701; Executive Law § 130). The petitioner's argument that the revocation of his licenses and notary commission constitutes double jeopardy is unavailing ( see, Harvey-Cook v. Steel, 124 A.D.2d 709, 710; see also, Matter of Barnes v. Tofany, 27 N.Y.2d 74, 78; United States ex rel. Marcus v Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 549; Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 399).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

O'Brien, J.P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Maneri v. Department of State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 30, 1997
240 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Maneri v. Department of State

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH C. MANERI, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
660 N.Y.S.2d 26

Citing Cases

Shane v. N.Y. State Dep't of State Div. of Licensing Servs.

Matter of Razik v. New York State Dept. of State Div. of Licensing Servs., 60 A.D.3d 769, 771, 875 N.Y.S.2d…

Shane v. N.Y. State Dep't of State Div. of Licensing Servs.

The New York State Department of State has wide discretion in fashioning penalties for a broker whose conduct…