From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Manbeck v. Manbeck Machinery Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 28, 1976
54 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 28, 1976


Appeals from decisions of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed December 12, 1974, November 17, 1975 and April 15, 1976. On March 18, 1970 the deceased employee herein was concededly involved in a compensable automobile accident, and he thereafter died of a cerebral hemorrhage on October 22, 1970. The board awarded claimant death benefits after finding that her deceased husband's death was causally related to his industrial accident, and the sole question presented on this appeal is whether substantial evidence supports the board's determination that the decedent's demise was causally related to aggravation of his underlying hypertensive cerebral vascular disease resulting from his industrial accident. We find that the board's decision must be affirmed because substantial medical evidence in the record, including both oral testimony and documentary evidence, supports its determination as to causality, and any conflict in the expert opinions presented were for the board to resolve (cf. Matter of Miller v Dimon Son, 45 A.D.2d 788). Decisions affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Sweeney, J.P., Main, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Manbeck v. Manbeck Machinery Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 28, 1976
54 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Manbeck v. Manbeck Machinery Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of EDYTHE MANBECK, Respondent, v. MANBECK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kwiecien v. Charlow

While the claimant's doctor abstained from making a diagnosis of the condition of the claimant's left knee…

Matter of Baldassari v. Greenwich Mills Co.

Doctor Fischl, an impartial specialist, testified that in his opinion the patient died as the result of…