From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Malik v. Berlinland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 15, 1990
158 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 15, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Sullivan County (Hanofee, J.).


Petitioner, an inmate in the special housing unit (hereinafter SHU) at Sullivan Correctional Facility in Sullivan County, commenced this proceeding alleging that the food served to him in SHU was being contaminated by the styrofoam "median" that it was served in, thereby causing him numerous bodily pains and anxieties. Respondents annexed to their answer the affidavit of Wayne Wilhelm, Deputy Superintendent for security at the facility, who averred that "[a]ll inmates [in SHU] get identical food" and that "[petitioner's] food is not contaminated". Supreme Court dismissed the petition. This appeal ensued.

There should be an affirmance. Petitioner has not supported the petition with factual allegations of an evidentiary nature or provided other competent proof to establish that the food was contaminated and that he was injured thereby. Supreme Court properly dismissed this facially deficient petition, given the absence of any underlying support for petitioner's conclusory allegations (see, Matter of Barnes v La Vallee, 39 N.Y.2d 721, 722; Matter of Young v Coughlin, 144 A.D.2d 753, 754, lv dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 625; Matter of Sebastiano v Harris, 76 A.D.2d 1004, 1005, affd 54 N.Y.2d 1014; compare, Matter of Rivera v Smith, 63 N.Y.2d 501, 512).

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Casey, J.P., Weiss, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Malik v. Berlinland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 15, 1990
158 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Malik v. Berlinland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ABDEL-JABBOR MALIK, Appellant, v. OFFICER BERLINLAND et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 15, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 421

Citing Cases

UNIVERSAL WASTE v. DEC

The Department argues the following points of law (respondent's mem of law at 26ff):[*] (1) petitioners must…

Universal Waste, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

The Department argues the following points of law (respondent's mem of law at 26ff): (1) petitioners must…