Opinion
October 16, 1978
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated July 5, 1977, which denied the application and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration forthwith. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The collective bargaining agreement between the parties contains a broad arbitration clause, which provides for arbitration of any grievance involving the claimed violation, misinterpretation or inequitable application of the agreement. Undoubtedly, the grievance presented by the respondents falls within the ambit of that provision. The possibility that the arbitrator, in making his award, might exceed his authority under the collective bargaining agreement, or that the award might be contrary to the public policy of this State, is not sufficient to compel judicial intervention into the arbitration process at this point (cf. Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn., 45 N.Y.2d 411). Hopkins, J.P., Martuscello, Latham and Hawkins, JJ., concur.